Update on the group of Hondurans moving north
The official word is that they will arrive in Tijuana with a total travel time of a month. That equals 125 miles a day, walking on the types of roads they will be walking. The walk is much longer than the Oregon trail. FOLKS, THE BOSTON MARATHON IS 26 miles. The world record time was over two hours for the Boston Marathon. So we are supposed to believe a group of men women and children are going to do the equivalent of five boston marathons a day, for an entire month!!! It is such patent bullshit I'd be laughing if they did not expect us to believe it. GRASS ROOTS? MY @, this has George Soros written all over it!
Trump drank the Honduran marcher kool aid
Well what can I say? He follows the MSM. According to the latest fakery, they are six days into their journey now. Let me do a comparison here, to prove this story is BULLSHIT, as I earlier claimed. During the settler days, the Oregon Trail took 5-6 months to travel and was 2200 miles long. This trip the Hondurans are taking, if measured EXACTLY AS THE CROW FLIES, is 1950 miles long. But reality does not work that way, even if they walk Mexico's version of the interstate (they are not) by the time they deal with roads that are not perfectly straight, and walking extra to accomodate how the roads connect, their trip will be 2,700 miles long (longer than the Oregon trail.) That means, at the earliest possible time, they should be arriving in October. Since news media cycles don't last that long, they are going to have to arrive in a week or two to satisfy the story line. And that is flatly impossible. The story is pure unadulterated BULLSHIT, there is no way out of it. The media is going to depend on your ignorance to get you to believe this story. They will try to get you to believe Mexico is short enough to walk so quickly. But the reality is that the distance these people have to walk is a LOT longer than the Oregon trail, and they will have to deal with walking up and down mountains the ENTIRE WAY, all of Mexico in the portion they are claimed to be walking is mountainous. Just get a map and take a look.
More importantly please note that the time I listed for traveling the Oregon trail is the time it took a wagon team, walking on foot was WORSE. It is real easy to huff out 50 miles in one day walking, for the first day. You might even go a distance the second day. After that, you're TOAST, and what happened on the Oregon trail proves it.
Also, I noticed in the pictures that they are walking on side roads (as would be needed for a photo op) and not the autopista, which is Mexico's equivalent of the interstate. Once you hit the type of road they are claiming these people are actually on, your trip from North to South will be at least 3,500 miles because that type of road does nothing but wind through mountains in Mexico, and never just goes "north". Mexico is practically ALL MOUNTAIN along the route they are claimed to be taking. This is truly another false "children on trains" episode, my original report on this follows.
RUMOR: Army of Central American illegals marching North through Mexico
There is a rumor that over a thousand central Americans are marching North through Mexico to enter the United States. I doubt it, but since I have seen this posted a zillion places I might as well mention it.
Unless Americans are violent or caught committing serious crimes, they usually don't get deported from Mexico. However, if a horde of Central Americans were walking through Mexico, they'd be busted post haste. I suspect this is another "children on trains" episode, there are only a few north/south routes that can be used, and mums the word in Mexico, I have not heard anything about this. How about some logistics?
The story is they are walking in one big group, north. That they crashed the Mex border and nothing was done to stop them. NOW LOGISTICS:
1. Men women and children are supposedly doing this, and they are WALKING. QUESTION: How far can a kid walk in a day, and when that is done, mom or dad have to carry the kid. How far will that go? 30 miles MAX, per day? on unfamiliar roads, where Mexicans hate these types far more than Americans are annoyed by Mexicans?
2. Miles are miles, and you have to eat. Assuming these are poor people, well, if you are expending energy you have to eat. In Mex, that will, if you have no support and have to eat out, it will put you back at least $10 a day. Where did these people get the money to buy 15 food items each from Tamale Juan? Add water and whatever else. Aint happening. NOPE. Mexico is really really long from south to North, look at it! It is more distance than the Mex border to Canada! What group of 1000 could possibly just up and walk that far with nothing? If they had enough money for food, they could take the bus a LOT CHEAPER than paying for that much food, howcome they did not? Anyone can take a bus in Mex, just buy a ticket. It is that easy. AND A LOT cheaper than walking! By the time anyone walked 300 miles, a ticket for a 2000 mile bus ride would be CHEAPER than eating while walking that far. On that merit alone, the story is B.S.
3. Where are these thousand people going to sleep? The pictures of these people just show a crowd walking, not a caravan with massive back packs for blankets and whatever shelter they'd need. Just plain clothes people walking with NOTHING. YES, BULLSHIT. Another fake children on trains episode,
There is NOT a group of 1000 people walking all the way across Mexico, without a dime in their pockets, children and all, with no blankets or anything else. They have to eat, they have to sleep, and the locals hate them. IMPOSSIBLE STORY FOLKS.
Real time mind reading machine?
Apparently a new device has been developed that knows what you are thinking, and can convert it to plain text with 90 percent accuracy instantly. I do know that at Comdex in 1994, Sony showed off a game controller that allowed you to control a video game with your thoughts, it worked, and vanished, never to be released. So it would not suprise me if this device that can actually know what you are thinking is real, but I still have a few doubts, it is a Daily Mail report. See this.
March for our lives planned MONTHS in advance
Further confirming the Florida shooting was fake, we have the following:
How much more obvious can it get when the march, which was "inspired by the shooting" was actually organized and prepared for months in advance? I originally found this on The Memory Hole
Palestine land day protests rumors of massive numbers of dead
There are rumors that during the recent land day protests (during which Palestinians protest land taken by Israel) that there are a lot more than the now reported 17 dead. It is aknowledged by Israel that their snipers shot over a thousand, but they are not admitting how many they actually killed. Even the definitive source on Palestinian issues - The Palestine Chronicle,is still saying only 16 people were actually killed. If Israeli snipers wanted injuries and not deaths, they could accomplish that, but I doubt they would have wanted to. SO, as a precedent, to get closer to the actual number of dead, let's reference Jenin.
The Jenin massacre was what really woke me up to the truth, including 911 truth and the rest of it. I already had some info but I had not completely broken out of the disinfo shell until Jenin happened.
Prior to Jenin, I had gotten in touch with an Yugoslavian named Mladen Mjatovik, who sent me photos and told me what really happened during America's assault on Yugoslavia. Revenge for the Yugo aside, he confirmed that it was in fact a war on Yugoslavian Christians, and he gave plenty of detail. That was a serious wake up call, that got me digging for more. A few years after that, Jenin happened and I was onto it early on.
I managed to crack into Jenin and get into contact with someone on the ground there who managed to keep a brief outside connection with a cell phone typical of the day (back then all cell phones were crappy) but at least he got pictures out. The Israelis were lining people up face down in the street and killing them, then they took the bodies to the main center of destruction and ground them into the dirt by repeatedly driving over the bodies with bulldozers. The stench was reportedly unbelievable, but there were "no bodies to be found" because they were one with the dirt, dust, and rubble. I had estimated that at that time, Israel in fact killed between 2,000 and 5,000 people in Jenin. They reported something like 47 dead. The hard drive his unique photos were on suddenly overheated and died (gee, I wonder why). So how does Jenin math match the latest Land protest day? well, there are factors that need to be considered with this.
First of all, they did not have bulldozers to eliminate evidence this time, by smashing it into the dirt until it vanished, (In Jenin this process took about a week and a half, for them to really mix it good and vanish the bodies good) but this time they had no bulldozers to do this with. So how many are really dead?
We know they were not honest with Jenin. So as logic would have it, they are not being honest with the numbers now. But with a lack of a way to totally destroy all evidence, they can't be quite as dishonest this time. My answer to how many are dead with over a thousand shot? More than 17, you take it from there.
UPDATE: They are claiming they only shot people who were "about to make it over the fence, into Israel. FENCE??!!?? WTF ARE THEY TALKING ABOUT???
https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/automatic-guns-radar-sensors-how-india-is-using-israel-tech-to-tackle-infiltration-on-pakistan-border-326842-2016-07-01
Israel does not have a "fence", they have a 30 foot high solid concrete wall that has AI controlled guns that shoot automatically. No one would ever get over that, there was never a need for actual snipers to shoot anyone!
Read that linked report, which talks about how India is installing the same system Israel has, and since it is India, they got away with describing how Israel's system really is. The reports coming out of Israel regarding these protests are proven ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT.
It cannot have happened the way they said it did, there is no way any sniper legitimately shot anyone who "was about to breach the fence", the automatic systems would have done that job if that story was true!
The latest music by female singers is pure destruction
I have not listened to music for several years. I have been so caught up in the world's political problems I have not cared to listen at all. However, a couple days ago I went to fix my brother in law's car and he was late out of bed and took a while to come to the door, so I hooked up some speakers I put in the back of the car a couple years ago because I never cared to hook them up . . . . until now. A few minutes later and the radio (which had totally trash speakers) sounded OK. So I have been listening to it. And I noticed something with all the songs in English -
I do not know who these singers are, (probably J-lo and Rianna) or similar. But they are pushing songs that are pure societal destruction. Far worse than George Michael's "I want your sex" and the other crap that was so "horrible" - the songs these singers are singing are pure psychological programming to get women to hate men and live alone.
One example is one where she is going through the reasons why she should throw a man out and "don't pick up the phone, he's drunk and alone" And another one talks all about "I am beautiful" and then she sings to the women listening saying "You are beautiful" and don't take crap from anyone, and it sounds like a classic song but the message is pure self aggrandizement and selfishness, but the one that REALLY set me off played over the speakers at Wal Mart. It was about being lonely.
The song basically went like this: Why do we need someone? Is it worth it to tolerate someone else just to avoid being lonely? And then she says to the guy in bed with her: You are only here because you are lonely and I am filling a need you think you have (with the implication being the guy is worthless, and she should be happy without him and not put up with the fact that he has some sort of "need" to not be lonely.) And the basic gist of the song was to tell women that their lives can be full and happy even if they are lonely, tell the guy to go to hell.
There are many others, but those are the three that really tweaked me. What on earth happened to music? Who on earth got in charge of it and started using EVERY SINGLE SONG SUNG BY AMERICAN WOMEN WITHOUT EXCEPTION THAT I HAVE HEARD SO FAR as a venue for making women hate men, to convince women that men are worthless and they should just live alone? Someone in Hollywood needs to hang for that, there is no way these women wrote those songs, they are cold calculated destruction from the deepest most evil think tank, and these women sing them with conviction, perhaps because they are too stupid to know what they are doing. No one in their right mind would ever say that sh**, it is all just like the song "We'll sing in the sunshine" where the woman starts out with the first line:
I will never love you The cost of love's too dear But though I'll never love you I'll stay with you one year
I'll sing to you each mornin' I'll kiss you every night But darlin', don't cling to me I'll soon be out of sight
My daddy he once told me "Hey, don't you love you any man" "Just take what they may give you" "And give but what you can"
But we can sing in the sunshine We'll laugh every da-a-y We'll sing in the sunshine Then I'll be on my way"
Who the * wrote that sick POS? All anyone focused on was how nice the "we'll sing in the sunshine" line was, but I'd really like to know who her worthless dad was (doubt she wrote it) probably Rockefeller or Rothschild or Soros, someone seriously sick. They don't live like that, but they certainly want us to, so our lives are total shambles and we are easy to control . . . . .and the stuff I heard over the newly fixed radio is EVEN WORSE!
Trump: "We are going to have 100 percent of the caliphate"
The only way to get 100 percent of the caliphate is to have a war. "Caliphate" is a Muslim reference to land. In Islamic terms, that means the whole deal, from Morocco to Turkey, but Trump probably means just Syria. Maybe that is why Trump gave the sauds $100 billion in war toys - for the proxy war? Maybe that is also why Israeli jets recently over flew Iran?
I have no idea what has happened to Trump, but this is not what I was hoping for. Even CNN has this, But I will link Newsmax. The report implies he's talking about the ISIS caliphate, but the context of the language does not fit that. Let's keep our fingers crossed and hope he's only talking about pulling out of Syria, and not expanding the war elsewhere.
Largest Christian university opening state of the art gun range
Now they will no doubt be targeted for a mass shooting!
From Fox News "As schools nationwide debate on how to keep firearms away from campus, Liberty University opened a multimillion-dollar gun range Monday for student activities and hosting competitions.
The largest Christian university, located in Lynchburg, Va., already allows students to have guns in their dorms and more than 3,000 students have completed free firearm safety courses offered through LUPD, a prerequisite to use the new range.
Brad Butler, Liberty's planning coordinator, told Fox News the range, which should be opened to the public later this summer, is modeled after the NRA Whittington Center in New Mexico.
VW buyback program - stunning photos
A couple years ago VW got busted for making their cars too fuel efficient by tweaking the emissions with software. The software knew when the car was moving or stationary, and when it was stationary it tweaked the emissions to make it pass emissions test. However, once on the road, the software would then change, to make the cars get better fuel economy.
Obviously the cleaner a car runs, the more MPG you get. But the emissions standards in the U.S. force fuel economy to be lower than it could be, under the mythical excuse that somehow, Nitrous oxide is bad for the environment. nitrous oxide is what is in fertilizer, and is produced by thunder storms, which dwarf vehicle emissions, but science does not matter to a global warming freak or totally corrupted politician..
Anyway, after doing the right thing, and making the diesels run cleaner than the law allows (thus producing a byproduct the EPA could detect and know it was running too well) Volkswagen was forced to recall 500,000 cars, AND HERE THEY SIT.Gee. That's too bad.
Chinese space station to crash on Easter according to the latest calculations, heads up for the show, it ought to be brilliant!
JERUSALEM POST: ISRAELI STEALTH FIGHTERS OVER FLY IRAN
Sources quoted in Al-Jarida stated that two stealth fighters flew over Syrian and Iraqi airspace to reach Iran, and even targeted locations in the Iranian cities Bandar Abbas, Esfahan and Shiraz.
The report states that the two fighter jets, among the most advanced in the world, circled at high altitude above Persian Gulf sites suspected of being associated with the Iranian nuclear program.
It also states that the two jets went undetected by radar, including by the Russian radar system located in Syria. The source refused to confirm if the operation was undertaken in coordination with the US army, which has recently conducted joint exercises with the IDF.
The source added that the seven F-35 fighters in active service in the IAF have conducted a number of missions in Syria and on the Lebanese-Syrian border. He underlined that the fighter jets can travel from Israel to Iran twice without refueling.
My comment: Now the precedent for war is set. Interesting it is that an Israeli paper is quoting an Arab paper, for "plausible deniability" perhaps? Then again it is the Jpost, which is total Israeli MSM. SEE THIS.
Sailor faces prison after drowning puppies SEE THIS
Question: If all things are equal, howcome the military did not punish these two soldiers for throwing a puppy to it's death? (the video downloads, you might have to open it) Oh, I get it, the puppy throw video happened in Iraq so it does not count.
Chinese space station
Some are calling the following report a hoax. But Drudge just picked it up.
Pope Francis: "There is no hell"
So now we have Pope francis saying something very similar:
"Pope Francis: 'There Is No Hell'
In another interview with his longtime atheist friend, Eugenio Scalfari, Pope Francis claims that Hell does not exist and that condemned souls just "disappear." This is a denial of the 2,000-year-old teaching of the Catholic Church about the reality of Hell and the eternal existence of the soul.
The interview between Scalfari and the Pope was published March 28, 2018 in La Republica. The relevant section on Hell was translated by the highly respected web log, Rorate Caeli.
The interview is headlined, "The Pope: It is an honor to be called revolutionary." (Il Papa: "È un onore essere chiamato rivoluzionario.")
Scalfri says to the Pope, "Your Holiness, in our previous meeting you told me that our species will disappear in a certain moment and that God, still out of his creative force, will create new species. You have never spoken to me about the souls who died in sin and will go to hell to suffer it for eternity. You have however spoken to me of good souls, admitted to the contemplation of God. But what about bad souls? Where are they punished?"
Pope Francis says, "They are not punished, those who repent obtain the forgiveness of God and enter the rank of souls who contemplate him, but those who do not repent and cannot therefore be forgiven disappear. There is no hell, there is the disappearance of sinful souls."
My comment:DEAR ANTIPOPE FRANCIS: Gee, that sure is a shift in Catholic ideology, are you a prophet or WHAT?
A lot more here - SEE THIS.
I do not believe anyone's internet got cut in any embassy. Enough said.
Skripal poisoning: Blonde lady TOTALLY BOGUS
This proves Britain is in fact clueless of what really happened, anyone could have done that, and they have no clues whatsoever as to who. But they are still saying Russia did it. See this.
And to see what they were originally saying, See this. It is obvious they only spewed if they blamed the blonde woman at first (for spraying them with the poison as she walked by) when now they know it was on the front door of Skripal's house, and entered through the skin. -SO- With no evidence at all, blame Russia. That has become a great general purpose claim.
U.S. setting up new military base in Syria
TEHRAN (FNA)- The US Army has started establishing another large military base in the Eastern part of Deir Ezzur province to further gain control over Syria's energy-rich regions, a senior representative of the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) said on Wednesday.
Mehdi Kobani, the SDF’s press secretary in Deir Ezzur, said that the new US military base is being built in the vicinity of al-Omar oilfield - the largest oil reservoir in Syria.
"The US is building a large military base in the oil-rich al-Omar region of Deir Ezzur province. Due to security concerns we cannot provide information about the acreage of this new installation. There is currently construction machinery working in the vicinity of the base, and security is being provided by SDF forces," he said.
Field sources said earlier this month that the US had established a base in Southeastern Deir Ezzur and dispatched weapons and military equipment to the region as Russia warned of American forces' possible attack on Syrian army positions.
The sources said that the US forces built a new and advanced military base in al-Omar oilfield in Southeastern Deir Ezzur, adding that they also transferred a large volume of arms and equipment, including missiles, military vehicles and bridge equipment to the regions of their deployment in Koniko oilfield, al-Omar oilfield and al-Jafreh.
Meantime, the Washington-backed SDF sent a number of their forces to the regions near the Syrian army positions in the villages of Jiya, Salehiyeh and al-Tabiyeh.
Moscow had earlier warned the Syrian forces of a possible US assault on their positions.
FLASHBACK: BUSTED!!!!
"Federal government" BUSTED for forcing American nuclear industry to become a ticking time bomb
Banning the closed loop nuclear fuel cycle put an end to America's free energy future and created a nuclear nightmare that was never supposed to happen.
Americans have been told their nuclear waste must go somewhere. Americans have been told their spent reactor fuel needs to be stored inside a mountain in the desert, where it will sit as a threat and menace to the world for millions of years. Americans have been told there is nothing they can do about it. But what if they have been told a lie? What if that "spent fuel" was not spent at all? What if a technology existed which allowed the same fuel to be used over and over, twenty times in fact, and expended so fully that fuel rods would be safe enough to handle directly out of the reactor? Think any "spent fuel pools" would be full? And even if this technology never existed,
What if foreign nations, (France was one) offered to buy this fuel from America for billions of dollars only to have the American Government refuse the offer for no reason at all? Certainly allowing France to have it would solve the problem of getting rid of it. And the final question, WHY would the American Government want so much nuclear material sitting around the country - enough to make countless atomic bombs - only to have it become a threat to America's national security? Could it be that for many years America has not had a legitimate government, and instead has had a band of invaders in power who have intentionally set America up for a fall? After reading this report, I believe you will be inclined to think so.
This report consists of hard scientific fact and even harder answers.
During my journey of discovery in my investigation into the Fukushima disaster, I interviewed an 85 year old nuclear engineer who worked in the nuclear industry during America's glory days, an engineer who earned GE over 100 patents. He was one of the engineers who designed Fukushima, so naturally when conducting an investigation into such a disaster a journalist would want that type of reference. He was surprised when my prior study of reactor systems was so thorough that he had no information about Fukushima I did not already dig up, and he was very surprised when I told him details about the inner workings of his own reactor design he never expected anyone in the media to know.
When I started to think I was going to walk away with nothing new, he began to talk about an entirely different subject. He began his new direction in the discussion with the phrase "My team succeeded in closing the nuclear loop, and Carter banned our miracle with an executive order
Here is what followed that introductory line, and an enormous reason why Americans need to seriously question the current government structure and possibly start over.
When a reactor such as a boiling water reactor uses fuel, the waste products, which are highly radioactive isotopes that have a different fission characteristic than the original fuel, build up in the fuel and change the nature of the nuclear reaction. A reactor such as a boiling water reactor can only use the fuel until it gets contaminated by these isotopes enough to change the nature of the nuclear reactions taking place. The reaction environment inside a boiling water reactor is only one such environment which will work to trigger a chain reaction, and if that spent fuel is put into a reactor made from different materials, those materials can favor the burning of the isotopes which interfere with the chain reactions in the boiling water reactor and use these interfering isotopes as fuel until they are consumed. After this process, which restores the fuel to it's original state is complete, the fuel can go back into the boiling water reactor and used as new with no reprocessing - the exact same rods can be exchanged between reactors.
We perfected the second reactor design which used liquid sodium as a coolant and the reactor ran much hotter - 1100 farenheit as opposed to 550 in a boiling water reactor. The liquid sodium circulated inside the reactor instead of water, with the heat of the reaction being removed from the system by a heat exchanger which produced steam outside the reactor for use in producing electricity. The temperature difference and coolant characteristics in the complimentary reactor facilitated the burning of the isotopes, and you got to use both sides of the reaction - the boiling water reactor produced electricity while producing unwanted isotopes, and the sodium cooled reactor produced electricity while burning the unwanted isotopes out. This process could be repeated 20 times, and when it was finished the fuel was DEAD and no longer hazardous because all of it's radiological potential was used up. It was a clean energy dream come true, and Carter banned it by executive order!"
He specifically stated that the burn down was so complete that the spent fuel was safe to handle directly with bare hands, and needed no special care or maintenance at all, and after I questioned him about exactly how safe, said you could safely sleep on it. I questioned him several times, saying he must be exaggerating, but he said ALL radiological potential was used, and the fuel was completely inert at the end of the final cycle.
Many people know about the liquid sodium breeder reactor developed by General Electric in the late 1970's but few people know the real story about this reactor, which this engineer developed. To back stab the public image of this reactor, it was stated that it's rods would stick and that liquid sodium was too dangerous to use as a coolant. But this engineer, the man who developed it, stated that this media campaign was a pure psy op which like many things the media and government says had no truth to it at all.
He then went on to lament about what a waste of money it was to have the technology banned because nuclear fuel is expensive and they were only able to use it to about five percent of its total potential without implementing this technology. He lamented the fact that his life's greatest accomplishment got banned for no good reason, and it was a tremendous waste of money to not use the technology his team developed. Electricity would have been cheap. So cheap that homes would not have been heated with oil or natural gas, electricity would have been the only sensible choice. Furthermore, with a reduction in the price of electricity by at least 10X, electric cars would have quickly become a standard.
This would have been America's free energy future, with the only real cost being maintenance of infrastructure.
He was sad that we were now paying too much for electricity. I guess that's how an engineer thinks. He had read my articleabout Fukushima and liked it, so it is an easy guess that his eyes were open to the global conspiracy. But I think he missed the obvious in what he said.
Here is what I think about this technology being banned, and it has nothing to do with preservation of resources or free energy.
Because the Japanese were at least allowed by their government to use a reprocessing technology inferior to what this engineer spoke of, Fukushima only had approximately 250,000 pounds of "spent" fuel at each reactor site, which remained intact throughout the disaster. But because in America no reprocessing is allowed at all in any form, the fukushima equivalents in America, such as TVA operated Browns Ferry and NSP operated Prairie Island have no fewer than two million pounds of "spent" fuel at each reactor site, which means that Browns Ferry alone could, in a worst case scenario, far exceed the damage done by Fukushima.
Contrary to what the scamming mainstream press has reported, Fukushima reactor 3 was destroyed entirely while at 3,000 PSI (far beyond specifications) which resulted in a complete core expulsion. This threw approximately 100,000 pounds of fuel into the environment, much of it in the form of brown dust that badly contaminated the entire surrounding area and was found around the world. Seldom reported in the press is the fact that the Fukushima site was so badly contaminated that it could not be approached, and remote control and robots were used in the months following the disaster to get the radiation down to a survivable level after the first three people to explore the site died. At 100,000 pounds of expelled material, reactor 3 could have produced at most 2 percent of the total contamination possible from a large American nuclear facility. This puts the possible disaster from Browns ferry at 50 to 100 times worse than Fukushima. Multiply that by Prairie Island and the over 100 other similar sized nuclear facilities in America and it is not hard to calculate that a serious national security threat exists.
America's nuclear waste problem was intentionally created
So now, 40 years after the ban, America has fuel pools around the country that are so full that they have exceeded even the extremely generous safety margins they were originally designed to have, and even modest pools often have over 400 tons of highly active isotope ridden "spent" fuel in them.
Having functional fuel pool cooling systems was never intended to be necessary. GE and others wanted only a fractional core of fuel sitting in a pool at any one time, with at most one or two entire cores, not 15 or 20. If all cooling systems failed with only the intended maximum of one or two cores sitting in a pool there would be no boiling of the water in the pool, no pending disaster possible from equipment failure no matter how severe. But the way it is now, if there is any sort of attack or disaster which prevents fuel pool maintenance at any of the facilities in America for a period exceeding three days, the water will boil off, the fuel will catch fire and a nuclear disaster of unimaginable magnitude far in excess of Fukushima will take place. And it never needed to be this way, in fact, the situation is criminal.
Foreign nations offered help, but the American government said NO
Simultaneous with the intentional building of the threat from having so much nuclear material sitting around came all the government scandals and lies about needing to put the fuel somewhere. Inside a mountain in the desert. Inside a dry cask. Maybe in the ocean, all the while the general American public was kept oblivious to the obvious answer: If they were not allowed to use it because of a nonsensical piece of legislation, why not let someone else have it, when other nations are willing to even pay for it?
Here is what I believe is the answer. And this answer needs to be spread far and wide.
Consider this: America's government intentionally put in place policies that de-industrialized America. That's an act of war. The American government put in place policies that intentionally destroyed America's schools. That's an act of war. And I consider forcing via mandate the buildup of hundreds of thousands, if not millions of nuclear warheads worth of perfectly good reactor fuel just waiting for a disaster to be an act of war as well - Only an enemy would intentionally mandate the creation of such a threat, who on earth would, other than someone who hated America? Not only did America lose a marvelous clean virtually free energy future, that future got converted into a threat that could very easily destroy the nation and take much of the world with it. All it would take to kill America, with America's nuclear facilities drastically overloaded with 5% spent fuel, is 150 smart bombs. One successful bombing run and it is over. And that's not even taking into consideration other disaster scenarios, such as earthquakes and computer virus attacks.
The enemy of America is now in complete control of the nation
The enemy of America is a sinister enemy. It is a small group of religiously "elite" people who weaponize everything. They have weponized sympathy, victim status, water systems, vaccines, genetically modified organisms and even terror - anything they have been able to think of, and have used these things and many more to cause destruction. And the nuclear industry, now blocked from a dream come true technology, can be used as a weapon.
The truth in this is undeniable
I honestly feel that banning this miracle technology; you should have heard the sparkle, the awe in the old man's voice when he said they closed the "nuclear loop", and the sadness, despair and anger expressed at it's being banned; I feel it was an act of war against America. There were never any accidents associated with this technology, according to this engineer everything negative said about it was a bold faced lie spoken by people of ill intent. America's nuclear waste problem is not scientific, it is political.
I believe this nuclear engineer opened up and told me about this because I was the first journalist he ever encountered that actually understood nuclear technology. He knew I would understand what he said and subsequently bring this story to the public. But outside of making the public aware by telling his story in an article such as this, what more can I do?
