Inconvenient truth??!!??

I did not make that error. That was a word flip done by an AI. If you see stupid errors like that here, keep in mind that part of the war we have to fight is the contamination of anything we try to post with errors that have been inserted to make us look stupid. "And" got substitued for "an" after I had proof read everything multiple times, and was laughing about: "DEMOCRATS CAN RIG A POLLING BOOTH, BUT THEY CANT RIG THE BOX OFFICE!" 

Yep, the flop of Gore's latest "An Inconvenient Sequel" at the box office is yet another form of proof we have that the voting booths are all rigged by:

1. Scamming the way the votes are counted by running ballots through the counters multiple times. This was proven when districts that showed hundreds of Democrat votes got audited, and there were 50 or less Democrat ballots actually there. 

2. Electronic vote machine tampering. This got proven on video, the machines were selecting candidates opposite to what people actually picked, and hacks are obviously an issue. 3. Dead people voting, where millions of dead people are now proven to be voting Democrat. 4. Many millions of illegal aliens being provided with all they need to vote, and in areas where no ID is required, they just go vote. 5. Democrats busing people around to vote multiple times. 6. Hillary setting up duplicate polling stations in key districts (this got totally busted), and then taking the ballots to the real polling location and using everyone who voted Democrat at Hillary's location to subtract votes for Trump from the real polling location so the total number of votes were correct, but they were all skewed towards Hillary. The vote fraud was so amazing that only in a totally usurped nation would anything like it happen, and Trump only won because he most likely took 80 percent of actual real votes. AL GORE'S MOVIE BOMB, coming in 15th place is solid evidence that no one buys the global warming B.S. and that liberals and Democrats are extremely unpopular. 

So DEAR FRIENDS OF AL: go ahead and do word and spelling flips on this site all you want, even if it reads like crap it is going to be considered orders of magnitude more credible than you!, and the box office which you cannot rig will tell the truth about what kind of crap you are. 

Let's put this in perspective. HOW BAD did Al Gore do?

On it's opening weekend, The Lion King played on TWO screens in the entire country. TWO SCREENS, and took in 1,586,753. World Record SO PER SCREEN: LION KING TOOK IN $793,377 And that's in 1994 dollars, that were more valuable. 
 
What's printed on paper back in 1994 opening mid-week and total was for only those 2 days not for weekend, ain't gonne be erased: 
I got more on LK. but anyways, back to report...

On it's opening weekend, Al Gore's blunder into stupidity aired on 180 screens, and took in 900,000. SO PER SCREEN, AL GORE scored below $5,000 in 2017 dollars, which are worth a LOT LESS. 

Let me make this perfectly clear, by doing a little "climate math".

Al Gore: $900,000 divided by 180 screens = 5,000 but then you have to factor in that the Lion King was 23 years ago. So cut the dollar value in half. Al Gore can then, against the Lion King, claim $2,500 per screen. 

If the Lion King took in 793,377 per screen, then people care 317.3508 times as much about a Disney cartoon than AL Gore's BULLSHIT. 

BUT NO, YOU WON'T HEAR THAT ON CNN, BECAUSE YOU CAN RIG A VOTING BOOTH, BUT YOU CAN'T RIG THE BOX OFFICE!

A giant pile of messages got through (by accident of course, someone got demoted obviously)Anyway, I'll go through them and see what got deleted since I photographed the screens full of messages this morning, when I saw they came in and did not get deleted this time around. 

A reader sent a message explaining how he confirmed the Perspective AI is bad for himself. It was a long post, so I will simply say I disagree with the methodology he used.

The Perspective AI is a poorly programmed pile of trash, that was obviously the victim of common core. It is heavily biased, but you can't use single words to find the bias, because the idiots that programmed the AI assigned negative and positive values to common words on a word for word basis, which simply does not work in real life. You can type "parasites are bad" and the AI will stupidly ban you. However, it gets smarter when you use phrases longer than two or three words, and only by using longer phrases can you find the real bias. It only takes a few words in a phrase to get it past the poor programming, that is why I am using phrases that are not super short, but have near identical wording in them, where only one thing in the phrase is changed. Then you can see that yes, Google is pure evil.

Overall, I have found a bias of about 40 percent upward in favor of Jews, and 40 percent downward against Christians. Combined, that equals a bias swing of at least 80 percent. That is enough to absolutely show an undeniable bias, and totally wreck the web. 

Assange:

Another reader asked me if I can see that Assange and Snowden are fakes. 

That reader must be new around here, because I have repeatedly said Assange was taken from the embassy last September when Pamela Anderson brought him a lunch that was very likely to have been poisoned. A black van showed up that night and got perscope streamed by an anonymous blogger. Assange was taken from the embassy and the next day he could not talk to anyone because his "connection got cut". Shortly before that, the Wikileaks lawyer got killed by a train, and shortly after that, the two top people at Wikileaks other than Assange were found mysteriously dead. So obviously Assange is now either CGI or some sort of meat puppet. This happened around the time of the DNC leaks.

I have always said Snowden was probably fake, because he said nothing more than what I have said, for years prior to him. If he was real, he'd have done a lot better than I did because his access to the classified side of things was much more recent. If for years prior I was saying everything was bugged the same way he said everything was bugged, chances are one purpose he served was to undercut the real opposition and be the MSM playboy. But whatever, at least people woke up to what reality was 10 years before Snowden. Better than nothing I guess. Things are obviously worse now. 

David Brock

"Bloatedtoad" asked if I knew about David Brock's plot to destroy Trump. The same confidential memo you sent a link to has been posted on this web site for the last six months, as the very first item above this window. Your source probably got it from here.

Mysterious sea creatures eat man's feet

I had this up earlier, took it down, and then decided to put it back up.

By now a lot of people have probably heard about the guy in Australia that got his feet eaten by "mysterious sea creatures". The pictures of his feet are horrible, the injury was obviously fatal without medical care. 

This actually worries me. I have never heard of anything like this. I have heard the "sea lice" hypothesis and don't buy it. You will notice if sea lice get you before anything like this happens. And I and have some suspicion that this might have been caused by a genetically modified organism that would make the oceans unapproachable. I don't want to alarm people, because this could also just be a freak occurence. However, if this happens again, WATCH OUT, something changed.

The obvious huge problem with this, if it was caused by something that was engineered, is that whatever did this would probably kill the ocean. There are some details that make this appear to be an attack by an engineered organism.

The big one is that all this damage got done to this guy's feet, and he did not even feel it. The only way that could happen is if whatever attacked him had some sort of anesthetic to prevent him from reacting. Contrary to what a few people have said, the ocean is not cold where he was, and his feet were not "too numb to feel this". This did not happen in antarctica. And if someone made a bioweapon that was actually designed to damage things as much as possible, it would make sense to design that weapon to mask the effects of what it is doing until it is too late.

Imagine dolphins getting attacked by whatever did this, and not reacting at all to get the organisms off of them until they lost all their blood. At least we can feel mosquitos, and mosquitos do not even come close to approaching how bad whatever did this to this guy's feet was.

The next thing that makes me suspicious about this being some sort of GMO organism attack is that this never happened before. What changed? Australia would be a good testing ground. And it is not like something changed a little, this was something BIG, that would have been fatal if this guy did not go to the hospital to stop the bleeding. There have been no other cases that were even partially this bad to set a precedent.

Another thing that makes me suspicious is that no one knows what caused this, people are only guessing. There are claims it was sea lice because when meat was thrown in the same place, the sea lice came to eat it. But that would happen anywhere in the ocean, so I am not convinced by it.

A possible explanation if these critters were not GMO: He got off of football practice and went to soak his feet in the ocean. Maybe he had some sort of athletic paste on his legs that acted like a magnet for these organisms and made them eat him when they normally would not. That is the only thing I can think of that could cause a freak occurrence.

1994, 2017, Alternative Media, Global Warming, Julian Assange, Movie, wikileaks,