NEED TO MAKE THIS PERFECTLY CLEAR:

 

The 2016 Ford Excursion is behind schedule. Normally manufacturers release the next year's model in August of the previous year, (which would mean, under normal circumstances the 2016 excursion could be bought in August 2015. But that is not the case this time, Ford is behind in releasing this and it will be released in most likely March of 2016, and in a head spinning twist this blows this false flag open like an exploding cigar.

QUESTION: DID FORD PROVIDE LAW ENFORCEMENT WITH A SPECIAL REMOTE CONTROLLABLE SUV THAT IS STILL IN PROTOTYPING STAGE? they would not have to be evil to do that, or complicit in this event to do that, AND IF THEY DID, IT WOULD BE EASIEST TO JUST STRAP IT ON THE CURRENT SOON TO BE RELEASED MODEL, RIGHT? IF IT IS A PROTOTYPE, YOU HAVE A FEW OF THOSE YOU ARE NOT GOING TO SELL TO NORMAL CUSTOMERS ANYWAY, RIGHT? 

 

Don't be fooled into supporting a war

It is obvious that the Islamic terror meme is being used to get Americans to support a major war in Syria. And Trump is pumping it up as much as he can. In fact, I think Trump might even be getting manipulated into going rabid on the "Islamic terror" meme so the elite can use his popularity to accomplish their war agenda. That makes a pile of sense as far as I see it. Anything that works I guess.

 

 

Doing a little deep digging for what think is a holy grail of truth in all of this that will prove out multiple conspiracies in one whack but won't say what that is right now to prevent censors from blowing it.

Will say this: find it curious that during the video of police "apprehending the suspects" there is NOT ONE SECOND OF ACTUAL FOOTAGE OF SHOTS FIRED FROM THE SUV. It just goes from perfect SUV to shot to pieces SUV in one frame. This was obviously done because no one ever fired anything from that SUV.

Went through a fair amount of footage of the SUV going down the road (everything I can find) using levels to try to extract as much sub detail as possible from the windows and it really looks like both the passenger seat and drivers seat are empty, and that the SUV is being driven via remote. The emergency flashers were on, which is super odd in a police chase but would not be odd if it was being driven via remote for a drill, and there was street radar which showed the SUV was only going 40 MPH while the police were chasing it which is double odd. At that point in all videos, the windows are rolled up and not shot out. So at that point in all videos, the police cannot say they were receiving fire from that vehicle.

All the video is super poor quality, but I can extract sub detail down to one step in 16.7 million with Gimp moved sliders for hours on multiple frames (sliders that let you go up and down in the sub bits you can't see when the video is normally playing) and after extracting every possible ounce of detail I saw no evidence of anyone in those seats. Believe that either the videos are all CGI or that vehicle was driven via remote. At some point should have pulled a discernable driver out of the murk from at least one frame out of many, and there is NADA.

Any frames that might have given enough detail to see clearly what was going on were miraculously missing from ALL videos, leaving only murky frames to work with even though all the before and after frames are there. Let's explain what talking about: (umm later, got distracted by the fact this SUV does not even exist yet, think that is more important. will see if can get a good extraction and post it later.